A recent study published in Nature Ecology & Evolution suggests that the unique evolutionary development of the different parts of the human brain, including its shape and the shapes of its component lobes, may distinguish it from other primates.

This trait also shared with Neanderthals, is thought to be related to the fact that human brains are never fully mature. Many people believe that humans have a large brain size is what makes humans, but this research suggests that there may be more to it.

The findings of this study provide a deeper understanding of what sets humans apart from other primates. Additionally, the research suggests that the differences between humans and extinct relatives, the Neanderthals, may be smaller than previously thought.

Human Brains' Unique Traits

The human brain comprises four distinct regions, or lobes, each serving a specific function. The frontal lobe is responsible for reasoning and abstract thought, the temporal lobe is involved in memory, the occipital lobe is related to vision, and the parietal lobe helps to process sensory information.

According to The Conversation, the focus of this study was to determine whether the evolution of the brain's lobes occurred independently of each other or if changes in one lobe were closely tied to changes in others, indicating an "integrated" evolution of the lobes. The researchers wanted to understand how the human brain might differ from other primate brains.

To investigate, the researchers looked at how the different lobes changed in shape over time among different species and measured the degree to which changes in one lobe correlated with changes in the other. They also examined how the brain's lobes are integrated as an animal grows and develops. This approach can provide insight into evolutionary processes because the development of an animal can sometimes reflect its evolutionary history. For example, the presence of gill slits in early human embryos is a reminder that humans have evolved from fish.

A Neanderthal skull (front) versus a human skull (back).
(Photo: Petr Student via Shutterstock)
A Neanderthal skull (front) versus a human skull (back).

ALSO READ: Neural Stem Cells Spend More Time to Divide in Brain Chromosomes in Modern Humans Than in Neanderthals

Analyzing the Two Distinct Brains

The scientists used two methods to study this question. Live Science stated in a report that the first involved creating 3D models of the brains of hundreds of living and fossil primates, including monkeys, apes, humans, and close fossil relatives, to track brain evolution over time. The second method involved using digital brain data from living ape species and humans at different stages of development to chart the integration of the brain's parts in different species as they mature. The brain models were created using CT scans of skulls and digitally filling the brain cavities to approximate the brain's shape.

The researchers were surprised by the results of their analyses. When they tracked changes over time across many primate species, they found that humans had particularly high levels of brain integration, especially between the parietal and frontal lobes. However, they also discovered that this integration was similarly high in Neanderthals. When they looked at changes in brain shape during growth, they found that in apes such as chimpanzees, the integration between the brain's lobes was similar to that of humans until adolescence. At this point, the integration rapidly declined in apes but continued into adulthood in humans.

These findings suggest that what sets humans apart from other primates is not just the size of the brains but also the deep integration of the different parts of the human brain, which persists into adulthood.

Peter Pan Syndrome

This unique trait, which is also shared with Neanderthals, may have contributed to the evolution of human intelligence and a greater capacity for learning, which is typically associated with the juvenile stages of life. This phenomenon, which could be referred to as "Peter Pan syndrome," may have played a significant role in the evolution of human intelligence.

This research has another significant implication: it adds to the growing body of evidence that Neanderthals were not the barbaric and primitive beings they were once thought to be but were instead adaptable, capable, and sophisticated people. Archaeological findings have revealed that Neanderthals developed sophisticated technologies, including the earliest known evidence of string and the manufacture of tar. Their cave art suggests that they were capable of complex symbolic thought. These findings challenge long-held stereotypes about Neanderthals and demonstrate their capacity for innovation and cultural expression.

These findings further blur the line between humans and Neanderthals and challenge the idea that some inherent intellectual superiority allowed humans to drive Neanderthals to extinction. In the past, some Western scientists attempted to attribute European dominance to certain cranial features that they believed were linked to greater intelligence. However, we now know that skull shape has no bearing on intelligence. It's also worth noting that humans may have come close to extinction about 70,000 years ago. If that had happened, it's possible that the descendants of Neanderthals would have been trying to understand how their "superior" brains gave them an advantage over humans.

RELATED ARTICLE: Peter Pan Syndrome: Bed-Time Story Turned 'Psychology' Disorder

Check out more news and information on Human Evolution in Science Times.