The Chinguetti meteorite's tale is a puzzling mystery, with a 4.5-kilogram stony-iron rock reportedly sourced from a colossal 100-meter-wide iron mountain in Africa around 1916.
Despite extensive searches, the validation of the larger parent meteorite's existence remains uncertain. Presently, a team of researchers is renewing efforts to trace this elusive celestial phenomenon.
Chinguetti mesosiderite
Chinguetti Meteorite: A Disputed Colossal Discovery in the Sahara Desert
In 1916, French consular official Captain Gaston Ripert claimed to have stumbled upon a colossal "iron hill" in the Sahara, suspected to be a meteorite, near Chinguetti, Mauritania. The discovery, if genuine, would represent a meteorite of substantial size, potentially making it the largest on Earth.
Despite Ripert's account and the recovery of a 4-kilogram fragment, the existence of the larger Chinguetti meteorite has been disputed, as subsequent searches failed to locate it.
Ripert's original account has been a subject of scrutiny, with questions arising about the accuracy and validity of his narrative. Despite the recovery of a smaller fragment, uncertainties persist, and doubts emerge when subsequent attempts to locate the colossal iron hill proved unsuccessful.
A 2001 study, analyzing the chemical composition of the recovered stony-iron mesosiderite, suggested limitations on the possible size of the larger meteorite.
The lack of an impact crater associated with the Chinguetti meteorite raises intriguing possibilities. Now, three British researchers aim to unravel the mystery and propose potential reasons for past unsuccessful searches, including burial under sand, inaccuracies in measurement instruments, or incorrect search areas based on vague instructions from Ripert.
Their paper also delves into Ripert's detailed observations of metallic 'needles' on the iron hill, suggesting they could be phases of nickel-iron known as 'Thomson structures,' a term not known in 1916, adding complexity to the mystery.
Probing Chinguetti Meteorite: New Methods for Historical Confirmation
The researchers delve into uncertainties surrounding Ripert's Chinguetti meteorite account while proposing a novel method for definitive confirmation.
In their study, titled "New evidence on the lost giant Chinguetti meteorite" available in the pre-print server arXiv, the team suggests employing magnetometer survey data to pinpoint potential locations buried beneath dunes.
This magnetic anomaly-based approach emerges as a promising avenue for unraveling historical mysteries, underlining the importance of scientific rigor in the pursuit of truth.
Utilizing digital elevation models, radar data, and interviews with local camel riders, the researchers narrow down areas mentioned in Ripert's narrative, where the meteorite might be concealed under dunes. They identify specific regions of interest and seek aeromagnetic survey data from Mauritania's Ministry of Petroleum Energy and Mines.
Despite their efforts, access to this critical data remains pending, leaving an alternative approach-on-foot scanning of the region-as a potential solution, albeit a time-consuming one.
The researchers acknowledge that a negative result from their investigation would leave Ripert's story unverified, along with persistent issues like the presence of ductile needles and the coincidental discovery of the mesosiderite.
The study's culmination will determine the credibility of Ripert's account and shed light on the mysterious circumstances surrounding the Chinguetti meteorite, showcasing the complex interplay of historical narratives and scientific inquiry.
RELATED ARTICLE: New Kind of Meteorite Believed From Earth That Went to Space Then Came Back Under Investigation
Check out more news and information on Space in Science Times.
![Earth's Quasi-Moon Kamo‘oalewa Could Originate From Lunar Surface Not Asteroid Belt [Study]](https://1721181113.rsc.cdn77.org/data/thumbs/full/53275/89/56/50/40/earths-quasi-moon-kamo-oalewa-could-originate-from-lunar-surface-not-asteroid-belt-study.png)
