Despite 40 million HIV-related deaths since its epidemic, over 38.4 million still live with the virus globally. Although research funding exists, developing an HIV vaccine proves challenging due to the virus's elusive and ever-changing nature.
While there may be no HIV vaccine by 2030, PrEP and monoclonal antibody therapies could serve as interim solutions. The history of HIV vaccine development is marked by obstacles, but recent scientific strides provide hope for a potential vaccine in the next 15 years. The feasibility and global distribution of such a vaccine remain uncertain, requiring the resolution of key barriers.
Why Haven't We Developed an HIV Vaccine? Exploring Challenges in Tackling the Elusive Virus
HIV's Complex Biology and Immune Evasion Makes Vaccine Development Challenging
Creating an HIV vaccine encounters significant obstacles rooted in the virus's intricate biology. The genetic diversity of HIV, coupled with its fast replication cycle and error-prone nature, poses challenges in developing a single vaccine effective against the multitude of strains worldwide.
The virus's unique ability to undermine the immune system, particularly by targeting CD4 T-cells that initiate the immune response, leads to immune exhaustion, further complicating vaccine development.
The virus also employs strategies to evade the immune defenses, hiding within latent reservoirs soon after infection. This poses a distinct challenge due to HIV's lifelong nature, as it embeds its genetic information into the host's DNA, making it invisible to the immune system.
Unlike many viruses that the immune system can eliminate, HIV establishes a hidden reservoir in immune cells, preventing both immune eradication and conventional drug treatments.
One of the most significant hurdles lies in the need for immediate protective immunity at the moment of transmission. With a vaccine, the immune system must eliminate the virus within 24 hours, an exceptionally high bar compared to vaccines for other diseases. This is in contrast to vaccines like those for COVID-19, which primarily prevent severe illness but may not entirely prevent infection.
The distinct challenges posed by HIV's ability to persist within the body make developing an effective vaccine an exceptionally complex endeavor.
READ ALSO: New Study Explains Why HIV Vaccine Backfires
Lessons from HIV Vaccine Trials for Future Breakthroughsfjty
To date, only a few clinical trials have evaluated the effectiveness of potential HIV vaccines, with the RV144 trial standing out as the sole success among six completed trials.
The RV144 trial employed a "prime-boost" strategy, administering six shots that included a canarypox virus carrying genetic instructions for specific HIV proteins. Participants developed an immune response against these viral proteins, supplemented by injections of an essential HIV protein fragment to foster a broad immune response against various HIV subtypes.
Although the strategy exhibited modest efficacy, it identified specific antibodies as crucial in reducing infection risk, reshaping the HIV vaccine research landscape.
Despite the initial success of the canarypox/protein strategy, recent trials, such as one in South Africa in February 2020, showed less promising results. The follow-up trial did not lower the risk of HIV infection in vaccinated individuals, underscoring the need for additional funding in HIV vaccine research.
Investing upfront and allocating resources as needed could enhance the efficiency of scientific endeavors, particularly in early animal testing, expediting promising approaches into clinical trials.
Amid challenges, there are optimistic indications that vaccine developers using various platforms are progressing toward creating an effective HIV vaccine with sterilizing immunity, presenting hope for future breakthroughs in the fight against the virus.
RELATED ARTICLE: HIV Prevention: Researchers Suggest Identifying Antibodies and Human Genes as New Strategy for Making Effective Vaccine Against the Disease
Check out more news and information on HIV in Science Times.
![Earth's Quasi-Moon Kamo‘oalewa Could Originate From Lunar Surface Not Asteroid Belt [Study]](https://1721181113.rsc.cdn77.org/data/thumbs/full/53275/89/56/50/40/earths-quasi-moon-kamo-oalewa-could-originate-from-lunar-surface-not-asteroid-belt-study.png)
