Where do people's beliefs and opinions come from? They would most likely say it came from rational, logical, and impartial analysis of available information. But in reality, people selectively listen and pay attention to information that confirms their beliefs while also ignore information that challenges them.
UPI reported that many politicians and social critics complain that the media created an echo chamber where people can only listen to things they wish to be true or motivated beliefs. New research confirms this phenomenon by testing whether motivated beliefs and the exchange of information could cause exaggerated biases.
People Only Listen to Information That Confirms Their Beliefs Even if it Spreads Misinformation Online, Study Reveals
Motivated Beliefs Explain Spread of Misinformation Online
Some researchers say that misinformation online is fueled by the motivated beliefs of people. To test this, they paired people based on their IQ scores in their study, titled "Social Exchange of Motivated Beliefs," published in the Journal of the European Economic Association.
According to UPI, the team paired participants with below-average scores to other below-average performers, while those with above-average scores were paired with other above-average performers. Each participant believed that they were paired with someone with above-average scores and so freely exchanged beliefs of what they wish to be true. Some have an optimistic view of their pairings, while others are pessimistic.
The team found that pessimistic participants who were paired with optimistic participants tend to become more optimistic. In contrast, optimistic participants are unlikely to adjust their outlook even when paired with pessimistic participants. More so, optimistic participants in below-average IQ pairs are unlikely to waiver from their motivated beliefs.
That means those in the below-average group only accept information that confirms their beliefs or reinforces their biases. The findings suggest that motivated beliefs drive confirmation bias, wherein subjects selectively give higher informational value to those who reinforce their beliefs.
Researchers say that pop misinformation and reverse confirmation bias is by providing people unbiased information about which IQ group each participant was in. Study co-author Ryan Oprea said that the study showed why biased beliefs are rampant in the age of the internet.
Impact of Confirmation Bias
According to Psychology Today, humans are not always objective and rational beings as their decision-making abilities become warped through motivated beliefs that often occur outside of consciousness. Psychologists have demonstrated ways that people deceive themselves when making a decision.
Very Well Mind reported that cognitive psychologist Peter Cathcart Wason showed that people seek information that confirms their beliefs. However, this only prevents them from looking at situations through an objective lens.
For example, people would seek positive information about their favored politicians during elections that put them in good light. But then they will also ignore information that puts those candidates in a negative light.
But not being objective and interpreting information only in ways that confirm their biases and uphold those beliefs, they often miss the most critical information about that candidate that might otherwise influence them into making rational decisions. Like in the study, giving attention to the facts will reverse confirmation bias and let people see the situation from another perspective.
RELATED ARTICLE: Bias Tells Who Looks Alike: Perception of Face Identity Influenced by Prior Knowledge of Personalities
Check out more news and information on Psychology in Science Times.
![Sat-Nav in Space: Best Route Between Two Worlds Calculated Using 'Knot Theory' [Study]](https://1721181113.rsc.cdn77.org/data/thumbs/full/53194/258/146/50/40/sat-nav-in-space-best-route-between-two-worlds-calculated-using-knot-theory-study.png)
